Parts on Fire: Recognising Anger as a Suicide Risk Factor
Internalised rage is one of the most overlooked drivers of suicidal ideation. In many systems, rage is not permitted expression outwardly, particularly in those socialised to prioritise compliance or invisibility. When rage cannot be directed at the source of harm be that a parent, a perpetrator, or a system. It is often redirected inward, crystallising into non suicidal self injury, self-contempt, or suicidal thoughts. From an IFS perspective, this rage is not malicious but protective. It is a firefighter trying to disrupt pain with intensity.
What makes internalised anger especially dangerous is its dual role as both protector and punisher. Some parts believe that the only way to stop emotional chaos is to attack the self, believing it to be the problem. These parts often inherited messages of shame, worthlessness, or defectiveness, beliefs that now masquerade as truth. In moments of overwhelm, they act fast. Their motto is not “Let’s die”, but “Let’s end this.”
In some systems, the same energy can move outward as violence toward others erupting from parts that no longer trust containment. Both trajectories are expressions of profound dysregulation and unmetabolised trauma. Engaging with these angry parts as protectors instead of punishable offenders shifts the work from risk management to meaningful integration.
Clinically, the presence of internalised rage particularly when coupled with hopelessness or shame should be seen as a red flag for suicidal potential. Not because the person is dangerous, but because a part of them is trying to perform a rescue using methods that were never meant for long-term survival. The goal is not to extinguish the rage, but to listen deeply to what it’s trying to prevent and to resource the system so it no longer has to act alone.
Large cohort studies have shown that people who habitually swallow anger report suicidal thinking more often than peers who are able to express it. Those who ruminate on anger have a higher prevalence of engaging in non suicidal self injury and suicidal behaviours. This is often higher in adolescence, with girls who both ruminated on grievances and kept them hidden attempted suicide at more than twice the rate of classmates who either expressed anger or let it fade. When rage stays locked inside instead of speaking, the system may begin to see death as its only escape.
So why does that flip from outward protest to inward attack feel so quick for some clients? Neurobiology provides part of the answer. Chronic sympathetic arousal driven by bottled anger elevates cortisol and depletes serotonin; together these changes shorten the gap between an urgent impulse and action. Cognitively, the narrow focus that comes with furious rumination can make death appear as the single clean solution to an impossible polarisation. Attachment research layers in another strand. Children who learned that anger frightens or alienates caregivers often grow up to be adults whose protective parts decide that silence is the price of love. Cultural scripts adds and national layer with some communities; viewing open anger as disrespectful. The Korean construct of “hwa byung” illustrates how stifled outrage can morph into somatic pain and suicidality over time.
Hwa byung literally translates to illness of fire: where anger must stay silent to keep the social fabric intact. People often describe a hot surge that rises from the belly into the chest, a choking lump in the throat, pounding headaches, and a fierce need to bolt from the room. Over time that hidden sensation grows in the body as muscle pain, palpitations, insomnia, and exhaustion.
What begins as a Protector part thrusting anger underground can harden into a whole inner battle convinced that open anger will cost family and reputation. Recent research found those reporting hwa byung symptoms were over three times more likely to report suicidal thoughts compared with peers whose anger found safer outlets. Poor sleep partly explained the path from hwa byung to suicidal ideation, while a strong sense of meaning mitigated the risk, exploring how burdened Protectors might soften once the system regains a sense of purpose.
Hwa byung personifies a rageful Protector forced into a cultural straightjacket. With no permission to express outwardly it bashes the body it inhabits and threatens the ultimate end when pain becomes unbearable. When the part is welcomed, its story heard, and its vigilance honoured, the fire that once burned within can be redirected toward setting clear boundaries and speaking truth. Somatic symptoms ease because the body no longer needs to shout as it is finally being expressed and heard.
Most therapeutic approaches acknowledge that suppressed anger is dangerous, yet Internal Family Systems offers a distinct map for transforming that danger into an ally. IFS assumes that every human mind contains multiple Parts, each trying in a limited and sometimes catastrophic way to protect the system. Within that frame an inner Rage Protector often emerges early in life to defend exiled parts that carry shame or grief. When the child learns that loud anger intensifies threat, the Protector flips direction and lashes the body it inhabits. Suicidal thoughts then become the ultimate act of self policing. IFS invites us to befriend that Protector, to ask with genuine curiosity what it is guarding, and to introduce the calm spacious energy of Self that is always present. The real turning point is not simply teaching a skill; it is witnessing the Protector’s devotion and offering it a new job description.
Other modalities can stand alongside that parts work. EMDR can target early memories where anger was punished, allowing bilateral stimulation to drain the old charge while Self and Protector observe together. DBT adds practical valves such as paced breathing, vigorous movement, or cold water dives that let the body release sympathetic steam without harm. Yet the centre of gravity in IFS remains the inner negotiation. We are not hacking away at a symptom, we are listening to a soldier who has been fighting a losing war in isolation.
For many clients the moment their rageful Protector is heard rather than feared marks a dramatic shift. Suicidal imagery loses its pull because the part no longer believes destruction is the only route to safety. Anger regains its original evolutionary purpose as a signal that something matters and needs attention. When the system learns that fury can stand up for exiles instead of silencing them the future opens.
If this perspective resonates, know that anger is not a moral failure and suicidality is not proof of weakness. They are messages from parts carrying burdens that once made perfect sense. With curiosity, courage, and a dash of compassionate humour we can invite those parts to drop their weapons and join the conversation.
Rage deserves an audience that listens instead of silences. In our IFS-based sessions we invite that fierce protector to step forward so the whole system can finally breathe. Join us virtually or in our Melbourne/ Brunswick office to shape a safety pathway that treats anger as part of the solution.
Reserve your appointment and we can travel this new road together.
Disclaimer:
This article is not a substitute for professional support. If you or someone you know is in crisis, please call Lifeline on 13 11 14, dial 000, or attend your nearest emergency department. You are not alone, and help is available.
References
Ammerman, B. A., Kleiman, E. M., Uyeji, L. L., Knorr, A. C., & McCloskey, M. S. (2015). Suicidal and violent behavior: The role of anger, emotion dysregulation, and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.044
Cui, R., Wang, Y., & Jin, S. (2023). Association between anger and suicidal ideation: A cross-sectional study. Current Psychology, 42, 13798–13801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02577-8
Forkmann, T., Monzel, M., Pietrek, A., & Wetzorke, K. (2025). Suicide-related metacognitions and maladaptive processing of suicidal thoughts. International Journal of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41811-025-00239-2
Glenn, C. R., Kleiman, E. M., Cha, C. B., Nock, M. K., & Prinstein, M. J. (2017). Understanding non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal behaviors in adolescents: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 214, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.02.026
Haddock, S. A., Weiler, L. M., Trump, L. J., & Henry, K. J. (2016). The efficacy of Internal Family Systems Therapy in the treatment of depression among female college students: A pilot study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 43(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12184 europepmc.org
Hawkins, K. A., Hames, J. L., Ribeiro, J. D., Silva, C., Joiner, T. E., & Cougle, J. R. (2014). Anger and suicide risk through the lens of the interpersonal theory of suicide. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 50, 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.11.006
Hodgdon, H. B., Anderson, F. G., Southwell, E., Hrubec, W., & Schwartz, R. C. (2021). Internal Family Systems Therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder among adults with childhood trauma: A pilot study. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 31(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2021.2013375 tandfonline.com
Kwon, S., Park, J., Cho, S., & Lee, J. H. (2024). Hwa-byung as a risk factor for suicidal ideation in millennials and Gen Z. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1461750. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1461750
Lim, J., & Kim, K. M. (2019). Hwa-byung and its association with depression and suicide among middle-aged Korean women. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 22, 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-019-00945-x
Liu, R. T., Trout, Z. M., Hernandez, E. M., Cheek, S. M., & Gerlus, N. (2017). Behavioral and emotional antecedents of non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: A systematic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 20, 471–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-017-0246-8
Nock, M. K., & Prinstein, M. J. (2004). A functional approach to the assessment of self-mutilative behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(5), 885–890. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.5.885
O’Connor, R. C., & Kirtley, O. J. (2018). The integrated motivational-volitional model of suicidal behavior. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 373(1754), 20170268. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0268
Schadick, N. A., Sowell, N. F., Frits, M. L., Hoffman, S. M., Hartz, S. A., Booth, F. D., … Schwartz, R. C. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of an Internal Family Systems-based psychotherapeutic intervention on outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis: A proof-of-concept study. Journal of Rheumatology, 40(11), 1831–1841. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.121465 marthasweezy.com
Schwartz, R. C. (1995). Internal family systems therapy. Guilford Press. archive.org
Schwartz, R. C., & Sweezy, M. (2019). Internal family systems therapy (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. guilford.com
Selby, E. A., Franklin, J. C., Carson-Wong, A., & Rizvi, S. L. (2013). Emotional cascades and self-injury: Investigating instability of rumination and negative emotion. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69, 1213–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21966
Tang, S., Chang, H., & Klonsky, E. D. (2024). Rumination, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 358, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.019
Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., Cukrowicz, K. C., Braithwaite, S. R., Selby, E. A., & Joiner, T. E. (2010). The interpersonal theory of suicide. Psychological Review, 117, 575–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018697
